Academia Adult education Aldous Huxley Altered states Community philosophy Contemplation Ecstasy hallucinogenics Higher education Latest Perennial Philosophy Spirituality Wellbeing classes Wisdom

Making and breaking counterculture

Print Friendly

Last week I met a small e-book referred to as The Counter Culture, written in 1969 by American historian Theodore Roszak. I beloved it. Roszak was the first to say the phrase "counterculture". His ebook provides one word concerning the dangerous climate of San Francisco (and Paris and London) in 1968-9, when creativeness was launched and every little thing appeared attainable.

Roszak felt something within the air. He felt that there was a cultural revolution among college students, and in some ways it was a spiritual insurrection, a wave of gnostic mysticism, the casting of a technocratic iron frame for intimacy and ecstasy. It was a spiritual revival, however not as evangelicals imagined. Aldous Huxley was closer to the character. Roszak writes:

Within the 1950s, when Huxley found a brand new era of ascendant spirit, his utopian picture turned brighter in his prediction that he provided to us on the island of violent tradition developed from Buddhism and psychedelic medicine. Just as he would out of the blue have seen the chance to seem: what is beyond the "loss" of the Christian period and its instant successor could possibly be a new, eclectic spiritual revival. That's exactly what now faces us as large information about counterculture. Totally different kids have actually received faith. No faith brand Billy Graham or William Buckley want to see a young campaign – but religion nevertheless.

Simply as Huxley predicted, the new spiritual landscape that appeared in the 1960s was eclectic, and the young individuals tried many various practices, from Zazen to I-Ching, from unique psychedelic rituals to the e-book of the Tibetan lifeless. Did all of them perceive? Not utterly. Roszak wrote:

On the degree of our youth, we start to resemble any cult of the Hellenistic interval, where each mystery and tarery, ritual and rite are confused with marvelous discrimination… No, young and don't perceive what these traditions are. The wisdom of the occasions just isn’t discovered by mixing a number of exotic catch clauses – nor does it train something from one's lore or faith by putting a number of talismans and dishing out to the LSD. The one that comes from such a superficial muddle is the Timothy Leary brand of easy-to-use syncretism: "somehow" all the things is one – however by no means minds exactly how. Fifty years ago, when Swami Vivekananda first introduced Ramakrishna's teachings to America, he persuaded the high society's dilettants to consider a lot. The outcomes have been typically as ridiculous as they have been short-lived. Nevertheless, our youth tradition is simply beginning.

Huxley (as Blake earlier than him) complained that rationalist Western culture had displaced the paranormal ecstasy for instrumental technocracy. We’ve develop into alienated from the non-rational features of our consciousness. Roszak accuses the tutorial of this religious alienation:

As a result of the spell of scientific or quasi-scientific considering has unfold in our tradition from bodily to so-called. Behavioral science, and finally a scholarship for art and letters, has been tended to ship something that isn’t absolutely and articulated in awakening consciousness for empirical or mathematical manipulation, a purely destructive catch class (in reality, cultural garbage) referred to as "unconscious". or "irrational" … or "mystical" or "purely subjective". […]

Hippie students rejected this and demanded coaching for themselves. He wrote:

I feel we will predict that within the coming era numerous students will begin to reject this redundant humanism by demanding a much deeper darkish aspect of human character that has lengthy been written off. Our dominant culture is "mystical"

It is completely unimaginable to disregard the fact that our intelligence has been devastated by the prevailing assumption, especially within the Academy, that the spirit of spirit is (1). ) Demise greatest left to the artist and marginal visionaries. (2) Historic Mint of Historic Scholarship; (three) a extremely specialized add-on to anthropology; (4) an historic vocabulary, which continues to be used by the clergy, however intelligently tender by its illuminated members. None of those approaches can anticipate that the dwelling energy of the myth, ritual, and disputes will penetrate the religious physique and that it’ll have some existential (in contrast to educational) which means. If a standard scholarship touches these areas of human expertise, it is often meant to collect info, not hope for saving worth.

He saw the other culture between the New Left policy (anti-war motion), the free speech motion, the rules introduced within the Port Huron scholar's assertion on the democratic society) and the municipal bohemianism and religious eclecticism. He referred to as it "a consciousness policy":

We perceive the unity behind the other culture if we see hip-bohemianism as an try and develop a character structure and a perfect way of life that follows the social criticism of New Left. At their greatest, the young Bohemians are the utopian pioneers of the world that are not a part of the religious rejection of the good society.

He means that students see a religious experiment and a mystical experience during a free university movement. Within the second half of the 1960s, students and academics across america began various campuses providing free courses. Some of the famous academics at Mid-Pensinsula Free College near Palo Alto was Joan Baez, Stewart Brand, Herbert Marcus and Richard Alpert / Ram Dass. It provided courses in every thing from LSD to psychodrama, from Taoism to non-violent resistance. It was a unified coaching of the dream of Aldous Huxley and Alan Watts, which contained a mystical and hooked up to political and ecological. "The natural state of man is an ecstatic miracle," proclaims syalabus. "Why settle for less?" Why actually! I've had to censor photographs of their curriculum …

Curricula appear to be from the attitude of the century technocracy schools, whereas as much as a course of happiness seems slightly there. But in recent times, we’ve seen the mysterious wave of comparable blends. Occupy Wall Road / Occupy London protests contained free schools, and these actions have continued at Occupy KCL, Occupy LSE, and different campuses, though these do not affect me as very religious movements. We now have additionally seen the expansion (worth) of adult schooling organizations offering psycho-mental schooling. There are locations in London akin to Psychedelic Society, Rebel Knowledge, The Weekend University, London Philosophy Club, Affiliation Room, Mantra, and Experimental Thought Firm. Nonetheless pretty much compared to MFU. And these religious blends are still fairly marginal to the mainstream of Western tradition. Capitalist technocracy was not overthrown, as predicted by Roszak, nor was there a lot influence on college schooling. Why is culture not a longtime culture? Why did it fail?

One cause is that 1968 was the height of a mysterious wave, and these waves all the time go. The charisma flame requires the crops coal, applicable business plans, otherwise the flame will quickly return. Free universities did not have applicable business plans (they have been free). Individuals Want Jobs

One other thing that Roszak discovered nicely was that counter tradition fetish psychedels as the only path to enlightenment. Huxley and Alan Watts stated they have been a route that shouldn’t be taken without correct preparation. But Timothy Leary (who Huxley referred to as her ass) tried to create a faith of LSD, demanding that everybody take it, even youngsters – her personal teenage daughter took acid, went mad and later committed suicide. Most American teenagers merely had no cultural or emotional gear to know psychedelic emotions. Roszak writes:

There’s nothing in widespread between Huxley's expertise and the intellectual science Mexican man and the fifteen-year-old pilot glider, till his mind turns to oatmeal. In a single case, we have now a gifted thoughts that strikes finely in the direction of cultural synthesis; In another, we’ve got a troublesome baby who "blows his mind" and is embarrassed to see all the gorgeous balloons rise. However when all of the balloons have risen and gone to the pop, what's left, but longing to see extra lovely balloons?

The level of psychedelic expertise – the enlargement of consciousness – at the degree of unreliable youthfulness is certain to be an abortion. The psychedelic results dropped on amorphous and alienated personalities have exactly the other effect: they scale back awareness by way of attachment… What is clear… that psychedels are a heavy weight that too many kids can’t get over or circumvent.

She quotes a ridiculous article at Village Voice asking, "Can the world do without LSD?" Can a person be a human without LSD?… The reply to what the writer of this text sees is very qualified, rigorously made, however weighty, completely NO. But the psychedelic expertise isn’t tied solely to LSD. At the least, different efficient psychedelic medicine have to be given. "

One more reason, maybe, that counter-culture fails is that it was badly marketed as a insurgent towards all previous traditions and mother and father. As Michael Pollan factors out, the paranormal beginnings are often embedded in culture, and the elders begin with a young ritual. In a psychedelic counter-culture, youth started themselves via a ritual that oldsters could not understand. Often the ritual binds society collectively, in the sixties, it tore it apart.

The counter culture was also a insurrection towards science and cause in Roszak's report. He writes that so as to restore ecstasy
there isn’t a have to translate the scientific worldview, and its committed commitment to self-centered and brain consciousness. As an alternative, there have to be a new culture through which the non-intellectual talents of the character come to fireside.

It's a mistake. Huxley stated many occasions that you simply need the most effective of both worlds – rational and non-rational, scientific and aesthetic, mystical and practical. The Roszak Revolution seems like a mystical fascism, especially as he demands a collective attack on the ego:

[the counter culture] assaults males at the core of their safety by denying all the things they imply once they categorical probably the most invaluable phrase of their vocabulary: the phrase "I". And but this is what counter-culture is sure to when it attacks the truth of the ego, as a unit of purely brain id, that’s remoted by its mystical tendencies or drug expertise

. ego-transcendence. The process for both the individual and the society have to be mild, sluggish and voluntary, not any Manson slender revolt during which you set the LSD in the water.

When the mysterious riot of 1968 failed when it did not overthrow capitalism, did not cease Richard Nixon's election, failed to end the Vietnam Conflict, then counter-culture turned nasty – Timothy Leary and many others embraced violent revolution and religious enlightenment by means of bombs. MFU turned a Maoist. A lot of the child boomer era grew up simply, obtained a job and carried out their psychological and sexual experiments in their personal lives on the weekend. Roszak writes sadly:

It might be one of many darkest mistakes we might decide to consider that occasional personal excursions to some surviving magical imaginative and prescient remnant – one thing of a form of consciousness that prevails within the nature of psychological trip – could also be sufficient to realize a sort of cultural synthesis that mixes the most effective of both worlds half. Such dilettantism would sometimes be a foolish technocratic answer to an issue that’s brought on by our unfulfilled psychological wants, however it might be a fraud from starting to end. We now have both the magical powers of character or not. And if we have now felt that they are shifting in us, we’ve got no selection but to free them and reside within the reality they are enlightening.

Nicely, that's precisely what happened. Individuals tirelessly accepted 5 days of technocratic capitalism and then a bit of cocaine on Saturday night time in discos and perhaps a automotive feast for afters.

Perhaps the infant growth is outdated, the counter tradition is finally mainstream. Perhaps ego-transcendence is much more acceptable, even in scientific research, even in scientific analysis. It’s a little late now, when the globe rises in real time. However perhaps something will come out and the ash will develop into a better and more mystical-ecological tradition.

An awesome web site concerning the Free University of Mid Peninsula is here.